|Title||Participant recruitment and retention in longitudinal preconception randomized trials: lessons learnt from the Calcium And Pre-eclampsia (CAP) trial.|
|Publication Type||Journal Article|
|Year of Publication||2017|
|Authors||Lawrie, T, Betrán, A, Singata-Madliki, M, Ciganda, A, Hofmeyr, J, Belizan, J, Purnat, T, Manyame, S, Parker, C, Cormick, G|
|Corporate Authors||Calcium and Pre-eclampsia Study Group|
|Date Published||2017 Oct 26|
|Keywords||Argentina, Calcium Carbonate, Dietary Supplements, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Patient Dropouts, Patient Selection, Pre-Eclampsia, Preconception Care, Pregnancy, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Sample Size, South Africa, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Zimbabwe|
BACKGROUND: The preconception period has the potential to influence pregnancy outcomes and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to evaluate a variety of potentially beneficial preconception interventions. However, RCTs commencing before pregnancy have significant participant recruitment and retention challenges. The Calcium And Pre-eclampsia trial (CAP trial) is a World Health Organization multi-country RCT of calcium supplementation commenced before pregnancy to prevent recurrent pre-eclampsia in which non-pregnant participants are recruited and followed up until childbirth. This sub-study explores recruitment methods and preconception retention of participants of the CAP trial to inform future trials.
METHODS: Recruiters at the study sites in Argentina, South Africa and Zimbabwe completed post-recruitment phase questionnaires on recruitment methods used. Qualitative data from these questionnaires and quantitative data on pre-pregnancy trial visit attendance and pregnancy rates up to September 2016 are reported in this paper. RStudio (Version 0.99.903 https://www.rstudio.org ) statistical software was used for summary statistics.
RESULTS: Between July 2011 and 8 September 2016, 1354 women with previous pre-eclampsia were recruited. Recruitment took 2 years longer than expected and was facilitated mainly through medical record/register and maternity ward/clinic-based strategies. Recruiters highlighted difficulties associated with inadequate medical records, redundant patient contact details, and follow-up of temporarily ineligible women as some of the challenges faced. Whilst the attendance rates at pre-pregnancy visits were high (78% or more), visits often occurred later than scheduled. Forty-five percent of participants became pregnant (614/1354), 33.5% (454/1354) within 1 year of randomization.
CONCLUSIONS: In preconception trials, both retrospective and prospective methods are useful for recruiting eligible women with certain conditions. However, these are time-consuming in low-resource settings with suboptimal medical records and other challenges. Trial planners should ensure that trial budgets cover sufficient on-site researchers with pre-trial training, and should consider using mobile phone and web-based electronic tools to optimize recruitment and retention. This should lead to greater efficiency and shorter trial durations.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry, Registration Number: PACTR201105000267371 . The trial was registered on 6 December 2016.
|PubMed Central ID||PMC5658921|
|Grant List||001 / / World Health Organization / International|